ForTheWardsFTW
HomeHow It WorksScenariosSign In
Sign In
Back to Scenarios

The Peer-to-Peer Insurance Call

Call an insurance medical director to appeal a prior authorization denial for a necessary medication, testing your ability to advocate within a bureaucratic system.

  1. 1
    Briefing
  2. 2
    Simulation
  3. 3
    Feedback

How This Works

This is an interactive phone call simulation. You'll speak with Dr. Evans in a realistic clinical communication scenario.

1. Start Call

Click "Start Call" when you're ready. Speak naturally as you would on a real call.

2. Have the Conversation

10 minutes to complete the call. The AI responds in real-time to what you say.

3. Get Feedback

End the call when finished. You'll receive AI-powered feedback on your communication.

💡 Tip: Speak clearly and at a natural pace. If you need a moment to think, it's okay to pause briefly - just as you would in a real conversation.

Briefing Details

1. Learning: The Art of the Peer-to-Peer

Purpose of this Scenario

The peer-to-peer review is a common, often frustrating, part of modern medicine where you must call another physician working for an insurance company to justify a test or treatment. Success in these calls requires a specific skillset: be organized, be concise, and be persistent. You are advocating for your patient against a bureaucratic system.

Key communication strategies include:

  • Be Prepared: Have all the relevant data at your fingertips: the patient's diagnosis, the failed alternative treatments, the specific rationale for the requested treatment, and the supporting evidence or guidelines.
  • Use a Structured Approach: Structure your argument like a mini-SBAR. State who you are, what you're calling about, provide a concise summary of the case, and clearly state your request.
  • Stay Professional: The person on the other end of the line is a physician, but their role is different. They are often following strict algorithms. Getting angry or frustrated is rarely effective. Stay calm, polite, and data-driven.
  • Focus on the "Why": Clearly articulate *why* the requested treatment is medically necessary for *this specific patient* and why the insurance company's preferred alternatives are not appropriate.

2. Scenario Briefing

Your Objective

You are the primary care physician. Your request for prior authorization for a GLP-1 agonist (like semaglutide) for your patient with Type 2 Diabetes and heart disease was denied. The insurance company requires you to use an older, less effective medication first. Your objective is to call the insurance medical director, Dr. Evans, and conduct a peer-to-peer review to get the denial overturned.

Patient Background

Your patient is a 65-year-old man with a 10-year history of Type 2 Diabetes, a history of a prior heart attack (MI), and a BMI of 35. His A1c is 8.5% despite being on metformin and a sulfonylurea.

Key Medical Facts & Justification

  • The Request: You prescribed a GLP-1 agonist.
  • The Denial: The insurance company denied it, stating he must first fail a trial of a different class of medication (a DPP-4 inhibitor).
  • Your Argument: Current medical guidelines strongly recommend GLP-1 agonists for patients with Type 2 Diabetes and established cardiovascular disease because they have been proven to reduce the risk of future heart attacks and strokes. The insurance company's preferred alternative does not have this proven cardiovascular benefit. Your argument is based on the highest standard of care for this specific high-risk patient.

Learning Objectives

Optional prep details

Learning Objectives loading

Optional Pre-Call Knowledge Check

Optional self-check before you start

Knowledge Check loading

This scenario requires an account. Sign in to begin the simulation.

After completing this scenario, you will be able to:

  • Structure a concise and persuasive clinical argument to justify a denied medication or test.
  • Articulate the specific clinical rationale, evidence, and patient-specific factors that make the requested treatment medically necessary.
  • Anticipate and formulate responses to common denial reasons cited by insurance reviewers.

When preparing for a peer-to-peer call, which of the following is the MOST critical set of information to have immediately available?

What is the most effective opening strategy for a peer-to-peer call?

If the insurance reviewer denies a medication stating 'failure to complete step therapy,' what is the strongest counter-argument?