You suspect a senior colleague is impaired on the job. Practice the high-stakes conversation of confronting them to ensure patient safety.
This is an interactive phone call simulation. You'll speak with Dr. Miller in a realistic clinical communication scenario.
Click "Start Call" when you're ready. Speak naturally as you would on a real call.
10 minutes to complete the call. The AI responds in real-time to what you say.
End the call when finished. You'll receive AI-powered feedback on your communication.
💡 Tip: Speak clearly and at a natural pace. If you need a moment to think, it's okay to pause briefly - just as you would in a real conversation.
This scenario addresses one of the most difficult ethical situations in medicine: suspecting a colleague is impaired and potentially poses a risk to patient safety. The professional hierarchy and personal relationships can make this a terrifying conversation to initiate. However, your primary ethical duty is to the safety of patients. This scenario is designed to help you practice a direct, non-judgmental, and safety-focused intervention.
Key communication strategies include:
You are an intern in the resident workroom. Your senior resident, Dr. Miller, has just come in for his shift. As you are talking to him, you can clearly smell alcohol on his breath. He is about to go see a new admission. Your objective is to confront Dr. Miller about your concern in a professional manner and prevent him from seeing the patient while impaired.
You are an intern. Dr. Miller is your direct supervisor on this rotation. He is a good resident who you generally like and respect, which makes this situation even more difficult.
Optional prep details
Optional self-check before you start
This scenario requires an account. Sign in to begin the simulation.
After completing this scenario, you will be able to:
According to professional ethics, what is your primary and most immediate responsibility when you suspect a colleague is impaired on the job?
What is generally considered the most appropriate initial approach when confronting a colleague you suspect is impaired?
Which set of observations would constitute the strongest grounds for immediate intervention with a colleague on duty?