ForTheWardsFTW
HomeHow It WorksScenariosSign In
Sign In
Back to Scenarios

The Request for Unproven Therapy

The family of a cancer patient wants to stop chemotherapy in favor of a non-evidence-based 'natural' cure they found online.

  1. 1
    Briefing
  2. 2
    Simulation
  3. 3
    Feedback

How This Works

This is an interactive phone call simulation. You'll speak with David in a realistic clinical communication scenario.

1. Start Call

Click "Start Call" when you're ready. Speak naturally as you would on a real call.

2. Have the Conversation

10 minutes to complete the call. The AI responds in real-time to what you say.

3. Get Feedback

End the call when finished. You'll receive AI-powered feedback on your communication.

💡 Tip: Speak clearly and at a natural pace. If you need a moment to think, it's okay to pause briefly - just as you would in a real conversation.

Briefing Details

1. Learning: Discussing Alternative Medicine

Purpose of this Scenario

When faced with a devastating diagnosis, it is natural for patients and families to seek hope anywhere they can find it, including the world of alternative and unproven therapies. This conversation is extremely delicate. A dismissive or paternalistic approach can shatter the therapeutic alliance and push the family away from evidence-based care. The goal is to explore their hopes and fears, provide gentle education, and find common ground to continue safe, effective treatment.

Key communication strategies include:

  • Explore, Don't Dismiss: Start by being curious. "Tell me more about what you've read. What about it gives you hope?" This validates their research and their desire to help.
  • Find Common Ground: The most powerful common ground is the shared goal of helping the patient. "We both want what's best for your father. Let's talk about how we can work together."
  • Use "I Wish" Statements: "I wish we had a simple, natural cure for this cancer. Unfortunately, the evidence shows that our best chance is with the planned chemotherapy." This aligns you with their hope while gently introducing the medical reality.
  • Harm Reduction & Integration: Is the alternative therapy something harmless that can be done *alongside* conventional treatment (e.g., a specific diet, supplements)? If so, this can be a compromise. If it's actively harmful or requires stopping proven therapy, you must set a firm boundary based on safety.

2. Scenario Briefing

Your Objective

Your objective is to have a conversation with David, the son of your patient with curable lymphoma. David has been researching online and now wants his father to stop chemotherapy and instead pursue a risky, unproven "alternative" treatment from an overseas clinic. You must navigate this conversation to keep the patient on his life-saving treatment path without alienating his son.

Patient Background

Your patient is a 65-year-old man with a new diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. His son, David, is his primary caregiver and is very involved.

Crucial Information: David is scared by the side effects of chemotherapy he's read about and has found a website for a clinic in Mexico that promises a "natural, non-toxic cure." He is highly compelled by their testimonials and is now deeply skeptical of the chemotherapy you have recommended.

Key Medical Facts

  • Diagnosis: Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, a potentially curable cancer.
  • Standard Treatment: The recommended, evidence-based treatment is a multi-agent chemotherapy regimen (R-CHOP), which has a high cure rate (>60%).
  • The "Alternative": The treatment David is suggesting involves high-dose intravenous Vitamin C and a restrictive diet, for which there is no scientific evidence of efficacy in treating this cancer. Stopping standard chemotherapy would be fatal.

Learning Objectives

Optional prep details

Learning Objectives loading

Optional Pre-Call Knowledge Check

Optional self-check before you start

Knowledge Check loading

This scenario requires an account. Sign in to begin the simulation.

After completing this scenario, you will be able to:

  • Analyze the family's motivations for seeking alternative therapies to inform a patient-centered communication strategy.
  • Articulate the principles of shared decision-making in the context of a family's request to replace evidence-based care with unproven treatments.
  • Differentiate between providing patient education on evidence-based medicine and adopting a paternalistic communication style.

When a patient's family expresses a desire to stop chemotherapy for an unproven online 'natural' cure, what is the most appropriate initial response to maintain the therapeutic alliance?

In the context of shared decision-making regarding unproven therapies, what is the primary goal of the clinician?