ForTheWardsFTW
HomeHow It WorksScenariosSign In
Sign In
Back to Scenarios

Consent: Emergency Intubation

Obtain consent for emergent intubation from a panicked family member in a high-stakes, time-sensitive crisis.

  1. 1
    Briefing
  2. 2
    Simulation
  3. 3
    Feedback

How This Works

This is an interactive phone call simulation. You'll speak with Maria in a realistic clinical communication scenario.

1. Start Call

Click "Start Call" when you're ready. Speak naturally as you would on a real call.

2. Have the Conversation

8 minutes to complete the call. The AI responds in real-time to what you say.

3. Get Feedback

End the call when finished. You'll receive AI-powered feedback on your communication.

💡 Tip: Speak clearly and at a natural pace. If you need a moment to think, it's okay to pause briefly - just as you would in a real conversation.

Briefing Details

1. Learning: Consent Under Duress

Purpose of this Scenario

Obtaining consent in an emergency is a unique challenge. The conversation is compressed, emotions are at their peak, and the stakes are life and death. Your goal is not a lengthy, detailed discussion of all possibilities, but to rapidly convey the necessity of a life-saving intervention to a panicked family member, allowing them to provide assent.

The key skills are:

  • Projecting Calm Authority: Your demeanor can help de-escalate the family's panic.
  • Radical Simplicity: Use the simplest possible terms (e.g., "breathing tube," not "endotracheal intubation").
  • Focus on the Core Choice: Clearly and directly explain what the intervention is, why it is needed *now*, and what will happen if it is not done.

2. Scenario Briefing: Consent for Emergency Intubation

Your Objective

You are an ICU physician. Your objective is to obtain verbal consent from Maria, the wife of a patient in acute respiratory distress, for an emergent intubation. You must manage her panic while clearly and quickly explaining the life-saving necessity of the procedure.

Patient Background

Your patient is John, a 65-year-old man with severe pneumonia who has rapidly progressed to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). He is breathing 40 times a minute, his oxygen saturation is 85% despite maximum non-invasive support, and he is becoming tired and confused. He is unable to participate in decision-making.

Crucial Information: His wife, Maria, is at the bedside. She is watching him struggle to breathe and is in a state of panic. She is tearful and overwhelmed.

Key Procedural Facts

  • Procedure: Emergent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
  • Benefit (The "Why Now"): It is a life-saving intervention. It will take over the work of breathing, ensuring his body gets enough oxygen and allowing him to rest and fight the infection.
  • Risks: You should focus on the most immediate and feared risks (e.g., damage to teeth/airway, ventilator-associated pneumonia) but frame them as secondary to the immediate threat.
  • Alternative (The "Or What?"): The alternative is not proceeding. If you do not intubate, he will progress to respiratory arrest and death within minutes to hours.

3. How to Interact

Starting the Simulation

Follow these steps to begin this high-stakes, in-person role-playing exercise:

  1. When you have reviewed the briefing, press the Start Scenario button below.
  2. You will hear a sound indicating you have approached the bedside.
  3. The AI patient's wife, Maria, is distraught and will be waiting for you to speak. You must initiate the conversation.

Learning Objectives

Optional prep details

Learning Objectives loading

Optional Pre-Call Knowledge Check

Optional self-check before you start

Knowledge Check loading

This scenario requires an account. Sign in to begin the simulation.

After completing this scenario, you will be able to:

  • Explain the critical need for intubation, the primary alternative (no intubation), and the likely outcome of each, using clear, jargon-free language.
  • Identify the core components of informed consent that must be conveyed in an emergency setting (Problem, Recommendation, Risks, Benefits).
  • Adapt the communication strategy in real-time in response to the family member's questions, concerns, and emotional state.

In a life-threatening emergency where a surrogate is available but highly distressed, what is the primary goal of the consent conversation?

Which communication strategy is MOST effective when beginning a conversation with a panicked family member about an emergency procedure?

What is the most critical risk/benefit pair to convey concisely to a surrogate during an emergent intubation consent discussion?