ForTheWardsFTW
HomeHow It WorksScenariosSign In
Sign In
Back to Scenarios

Consent: Central Line (Family)

Obtain consent for a central line from the overwhelmed daughter of a critically ill ICU patient, justifying the need for an invasive procedure.

Time Limit

10 minutes

Patient

Emily

Type

In-Person

How This Works

This is an interactive phone call simulation. You'll speak with Emily in a realistic clinical communication scenario.

1. Begin Call

Click "Begin Call" when you're ready. Speak naturally as you would on a real call.

2. Have the Conversation

10 minutes to complete the call. The AI responds in real-time to what you say.

3. Get Feedback

End the call when finished. You'll receive AI-powered feedback on your communication.

💡 Tip: Speak clearly and at a natural pace. If you need a moment to think, it's okay to pause briefly - just as you would in a real conversation.

Pre-Call Knowledge Check

Pre-Call Knowledge Check loading

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives loading

Briefing Details

1. Learning: Consent with Surrogate Decision-Makers

Purpose of this Scenario

Obtaining consent from a family member for an incapacitated patient adds layers of complexity. You are not only explaining a procedure but also building a therapeutic alliance with a surrogate who is often overwhelmed, scared, and protective. This simulation tests your ability to establish trust with a family member while clearly justifying a complex ICU-level procedure.

2. Scenario Briefing: Consent for Central Line

Your Objective

Your objective is to obtain informed consent from Emily, the daughter and healthcare proxy of an elderly, non-verbal ICU patient, for the placement of a central venous catheter. You must explain why this is necessary and superior to peripheral IVs, while navigating her emotional distress and suspicion.

Patient Background

Your patient is a 78-year-old woman in the ICU with septic shock. She is intubated and sedated. Her daughter, Emily (40s), is her healthcare proxy and is at the bedside. The patient needs multiple, reliable IV access points for vasopressors and other critical medications, and her peripheral IVs are failing.

Crucial Information: Emily is overwhelmed and feels like her mother is just being hooked up to more and more machines. She is suspicious of "more tubes" and doesn't understand why the small IVs in her mother's arms aren't good enough.

Key Procedural Facts

  • Procedure: Ultrasound-guided placement of a central venous catheter into a large vein (e.g., internal jugular or subclavian).
  • Benefits: Provides reliable, long-term access for administering life-saving medications (like vasopressors) that are too caustic for peripheral veins. Allows for monitoring of central venous pressure.
  • Key Risks: Arterial puncture, pneumothorax (collapsed lung), infection (CLABSI), bleeding, air embolism.
  • Alternatives: Continue trying to place peripheral IVs, which is becoming increasingly difficult and unreliable, potentially leading to delays or interruptions in critical medication delivery.

Make sure you are in a quiet environment with a good internet connection

When obtaining consent from a surrogate, their decision should primarily be based on what principle?

Which of the following is NOT a required element for informed consent for a central line placement?

In a patient with septic shock requiring strong vasopressors (e.g., norepinephrine), why is a central line strongly preferred over a peripheral IV?

After completing this scenario, you will be able to:

  • Justify the clinical indication for a central line, explaining the risks, benefits, and alternatives in patient-centered language.
  • Identify and address the common emotional and informational needs of a surrogate decision-maker for a critically ill patient.
  • Articulate the concept of substituted judgment to guide the surrogate's decision-making process.